Search
RSS
Twitter
Topics
: NLRB ADA ADAAA Adverse Action Affordable Care Act Appeal Appointments. Attendance Background Check Benefits CFPB Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Collective Bargaining Agreements Commission Companionship Compensation Confidential Business Information Confidentiality Credit Reporting Agency Criminal Conduct Department of Labor Disability Discharge DIscrimination Dodd-Frank DOL Dues Checkoff EEOC Electronic Use Policy Employee Handbook Essential Functions Facebook FCRA Firearm Flexible Work Schedules FLSA FLSA Exemptions FMLA Form I-9 Franchise Law FTC GINA Healthcare HIPAA Hiring Hostess Independent Contractor Individual Liability Internal Investigation Job Descriptions L.D. 35 Leaves of Absence LLeaves of Absence Maine Human Rights Act Maine Legislature Maine Supreme Judicial Court Massachusetts Law Mediation Medical Fee Schedule MHRA Michigan Military Leave Minimum Wage Ministerial Exception Misclassification NH Legislature NLRA NLRB Notice Notice Posting Requirement OSHA Outside Sales Pregnancy Discrimination Act Premium Decrease Protected Activity Protected Class Reasonable Accomodation Record Keeping Reporting Obligations Representation Elections Retaliation Right-to-Work Rule Making Seasonal Employment Seminar Severence Pay Skilled Labor Social Media Social Media Policy SSocial Media Policy Supervisory Liability Supreme Court Technology Telecommuting Termination Tip Tip Cedit Tip Pooling Title VII Trade Secrets Transgender Twitter Unconstitutional Unemployment Union Union Avoidance Union Representation Unpaid Internshps USERRA Wage & Hour WARN Act weapons policy Webinar Whistleblower Whistleblowers' Protection Act Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Board Work-From-Home Workplace Violence Yahoo
Verrill Dana, LLP

Verrill Dana, LLP is one of New England's preeminent regional law firms. With offices in Portland and Augusta, Maine, Boston and Stamford, Verrill Dana provides sophisticated legal representation to businesses and individuals in the traditional areas of litigation, real estate, business law, labor and employment law, employee benefits, environmental law, intellectual property and estate planning.  The Firm also has industry-focused specialties including higher education, health care and health technology, energy, and timberlands. 

Disclaimer:  The content presented in this blog is for general information only, is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice.  U.S. Treasury Regulations require us to notify you that any tax-related material in this blog (including links and attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and may not be referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.  While we welcome you to contact our blog authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.  

Thursday
May092013

April’s Workers’ Compensation Appellate Division Decisions

On April 3 and April 30, 2013, the Workers’ Compensation Board Appellate Division issued two more decisions on cases taken to the intermediate level of appeal: Haskell v. Katahdin Paper Co., Inc. and Thew v. Saunders of Lock Mills, LLC.  

Haskell v. Katahdin Paper Co., Inc.

Issues of interest that the Appellate Division addressed in the first case, Haskell v. Katahdin Paper Co., Inc., Decision no.13-3 include the effective date of the amendment creating the Appellate Division and with it, the intermediate level of appeal; examination of the process of applying the Act to a pre-existing condition; and a re-examination of the “arising out of” standard in a Bryant v. Masters Machine Co. situation setting.

Mr. Haskell had longstanding, non-symptomatic degenerative disc disease in his cervical spine.  On the date in question, Mr. Haskell was standing with a 300 pound pump suspended at chest level from a chain attached to an electric powered hoist that maneuvered the pump using a crane.  He had his left arm at the controls of the hoist, and his right arm resting on the chain.  He heard a sudden loud bang from the mezzanine level above him, where others were working, and jerked his head to the right and looked up.  He experienced immediate pain in his neck, with radiation into his right arm and numbness and tingling down to his fingers.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Apr232013

MSBA Labor & Employment Law Section Host Maine Human Rights Commission at the Spring Luncheon

The Maine Bar Association’s Labor & Employment Law Section hosted the principal decision-makers from the Maine Human Rights Commission at a luncheon held in Augusta on April 11. Executive Director Amy Sneirson, Counsel John Gause, Chief Compliance Officer Jill Duson and Chief Investigator Barb Lelli dined and interacted with an engaged group of the Section’s members.

While the whole luncheon was both educational and enjoyable, perhaps the most thought-provoking moment of the event came at the end, when Attorney Gause concluded the session by letting everyone know that he had just put out a memorandum on Individual Supervisor Liability in Maine in light of the Fuhrmann decision. The Law Court, in Fuhrmann v. Staples Office Superstore East, Inc., 2012 ME 135, 58 A.3d 1083, held that individuals are not “employers” within the meaning of that term under either the Maine Human Rights Act or the Whistleblower Protection Act. Nonetheless, it is Attorney Gause’s opinion, and therefore the position the Commission will take, that individuals may still be held liable for employment discrimination on other grounds, including interference claims, age discrimination in hiring, abetting, aiding, inciting, compelling or coercing claims and, most critically, retaliation claims. To read Attorney Gause’s thoughts, click on the link, above.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Apr092013

Maine Employers and the "Take Your Gun to Work" Law

Currently, under Maine law employers may not prohibit an employee who has a valid permit to carry a concealed firearm from keeping a firearm in his or her vehicle, as long as the vehicle is locked and the firearm is not visible. The law, however, does not permit an employee to carry a firearm in a place where carrying a firearm is prohibited by law. The law does include an immunity provision that protects the employer from any liability that may result from a civil action arising out of another person’s actions involving the firearm transported or stored under the law.
  
This immunity from liability, however, does nothing to assist an employer who, for policy reasons or otherwise, prefers that no weapons of any sort be brought on company property. LD265, sponsored by Senator Gerzofsky of Cumberland and entitled “An Act to Repeal the Restriction on Employers Regarding Firearms Kept in an Employee’s Vehicle”, seeks as stated in its title, to repeal 26 M.R.S.A. § 600, Maine’s current bring your gun to work law. The Maine State Chamber of Commerce supports the bill. More information regarding the bill can be accessed on the Maine State Chamber of Commerce’s webpage.

Thursday
Apr042013

Complimentary Seminar/Webinar - Plugging the Brain Drain: Strategies to Manage Your Skilled Labor Force

Whether it is a mechanic, an engineer, or an artist, access to a skilled workforce is an essential component to most businesses. Yet the most common way to recruit skilled labor, directly from the source, is wrought with problems. Formal trade schools, if they even exist, have trouble keeping up with the demand. Competitors sometimes snatch up the best candidates before they even graduate. Even if you can find qualified candidates you are still taking a chance by hiring an unknown person and Tentrusting them with a critical element of your business. This month’s seminar focuses on two novel solutions to this problem: Growing your own skilled workforce from internal candidates, and 2) Avoiding the problem altogether by hiring third party contractors.  Join Labor Group Attorneys Benjamin Ford and Tawny Alvarez as they discuss legal strategies to help businesses manage their skilled labor workforce. Complimentary light breakfast will be provided for seminar attendees.

   

 

Benjamin E. Ford

T: (207) 253-4828

bford@verrilldana.com

   

 

Tawny L. Alvarez

T: (207) 253-4522

talvarez@verrilldana.com

Click here to register for this event.

Monday
Apr012013

Newly Minted Appellate Division Issues First Two Decisions

The first two decisions have issued from the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Division this week, offering employers a first glimpse of a review process last seen prior to the reforms of 1992.

On March 25th a panel made up of Hearing Officer Collier, Hearing Officer Elwin and Hearing Officer Greene heard an appeal brought by an employer, Point Sebago, alleging that Hearing Officer Jerome had erred as a matter of law in determining the employee’s Average Weekly Wage according to 39-A M.R.S.A. §102(4)( B). Point Sebago argued that the wage should have been determined with reference to §102(4)(D), using comparable employee wages. The panel disagreed and upheld Hearing Officer Jerome’s method and decision. 

Click to read more ...