Search
RSS
Twitter
Topics
: NLRB ADA ADAAA Adverse Action Affordable Care Act Appeal Appointments. Attendance Background Check Benefits CFPB Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Collective Bargaining Agreements Commission Companionship Compensation Confidential Business Information Confidentiality Credit Reporting Agency Criminal Conduct Department of Labor Disability Discharge DIscrimination Dodd-Frank DOL Dues Checkoff EEOC Electronic Use Policy Employee Handbook Essential Functions Facebook FCRA Firearm Flexible Work Schedules FLSA FLSA Exemptions FMLA Form I-9 Franchise Law FTC GINA Healthcare HIPAA Hiring Hostess Independent Contractor Individual Liability Internal Investigation Intrasession Appointment Job Descriptions L.D. 35 Leaves of Absence LLeaves of Absence Maine Human Rights Act Maine Legislature Maine Supreme Judicial Court Massachusetts Law Mediation Medical Fee Schedule MHRA Michigan Military Leave Minimum Wage Ministerial Exception Misclassification NH Legislature NLRA NLRB Notice Notice Posting Requirement OSHA Outside Sales Pregnancy Discrimination Act Premium Decrease Protected Activity Protected Class Reasonable Accomodation Record Keeping Reporting Obligations Representation Elections Retaliation Right-to-Work Rule Making Seasonal Employment Seminar Severence Pay Skilled Labor Social Media Social Media Policy SSocial Media Policy Supervisory Liability Supreme Court Technology Telecommuting Termination Tip Tip Cedit Tip Pooling Title VII Trade Secrets Transgender Twitter Unconstitutional Unemployment Union Union Avoidance Union Representation Unpaid Internshps USERRA Wage & Hour WARN Act weapons policy Webinar Whistleblower Whistleblowers' Protection Act Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Board Work-From-Home Workplace Violence Yahoo
Verrill Dana, LLP

Verrill Dana, LLP is one of New England's preeminent regional law firms. With offices in Portland and Augusta, Maine, Boston and Stamford, Verrill Dana provides sophisticated legal representation to businesses and individuals in the traditional areas of litigation, real estate, business law, labor and employment law, employee benefits, environmental law, intellectual property and estate planning.  The Firm also has industry-focused specialties including higher education, health care and health technology, energy, and timberlands. 

Disclaimer:  The content presented in this blog is for general information only, is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice.  U.S. Treasury Regulations require us to notify you that any tax-related material in this blog (including links and attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and may not be referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.  While we welcome you to contact our blog authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.  

Tuesday
May152012

NLRB's "Quickie Election" Rules Struck Down . . . At Least For Now

Try as they might, the NLRB can't seem to get any of its new rules past the federal courts in Washington D.C.   On May 14, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia struck down the NLRB's new "quickie election" rules.   As we noted last June, the NLRB's "quickie election" rules would have sped up the normal representation election process and would have given employers less time to educate their employees about the risks and downsides of unionization.  The proposed rules would have also limited an employer's ability to seek redress from the government on certain pre and post election issues.   For the time being - and as the District Court expressly held this week - "representation elections will have to continue under the old procedures."

District Court's Decision

The Court's decision was straight forward.  For the NLRB to make new election rules, no less than three members needed to participate in approving the new election rules.  In this case, only two NLRB members participated.  Accordingly, the NLRB did not satisfy the quorum requirements under Section 3(b) of the NLRA and, therefore, the election rules were invalid.

Critically, however, the Court noted that its "ruling need not necessarily spell the end of the final rule for all time . . . [N]othing appears to prevent a properly constituted quorum of the Board from voting to adopt the rule if it has the desire to do so."    Whether the NLRB - which currently consists of three Democrats and two Republicans - will attempt to reissue the quickie election rules remains to be seen.  

What Does This Mean For Employers

At this point, it means that employers do not have to worry about the new election rules.  However, employers should be proactive in educating their workers about union issues, including issues relating to payment of dues and collective bargaining.   Similarly, employers should take the time to train and educate supervisors on best practices for promoting positive employee relations.  A happy workforce (that is treated with respect) is less likely to seek out union representation.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments

There are no comments for this journal entry. To create a new comment, use the form below.

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
« What is the True Impact of the Dodd-Frank Act's Say on Pay Rule? | Main | EEOC Changes Course And Extends Title VII Protection To Transgender Individuals »