Search
RSS
Twitter
Topics
: NLRB ADA ADAAA Adverse Action Affordable Care Act Appeal Appointments. Attendance Background Check Benefits CFPB Chamber of Commerce Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Collective Bargaining Agreements Commission Companionship Compensation Confidential Business Information Confidentiality Credit Reporting Agency Criminal Conduct Department of Labor Disability Discharge DIscrimination Dodd-Frank DOL Dues Checkoff EEOC Electronic Use Policy Employee Handbook Essential Functions Facebook FCRA Firearm Flexible Work Schedules FLSA FLSA Exemptions FMLA Form I-9 Franchise Law FTC GINA Healthcare HIPAA Hiring Hostess Independent Contractor Individual Liability Internal Investigation Intrasession Appointment Job Descriptions L.D. 35 Leaves of Absence Legislation LLeaves of Absence Maine Human Rights Act Maine Legislature Maine Supreme Judicial Court Massachusetts Law Mediation Medical Fee Schedule MHRA Michigan Military Leave Minimum Wage Ministerial Exception Misclassification NH Legislature NLRA NLRB Notice Notice Posting Requirement OSHA Outside Sales Pregnancy Discrimination Act Premium Decrease Protected Activity Protected Class Reasonable Accomodation Record Keeping Reporting Obligations Representation Elections Retaliation Right-to-Work Rule Making Seasonal Employment Seminar Severence Pay Skilled Labor Social Media Social Media Policy SSocial Media Policy Supervisory Liability Supreme Court Technology Telecommuting Termination Tip Tip Cedit Tip Pooling Title VII Trade Secrets Transgender Twitter Unconstitutional Unemployment Union Union Avoidance Union Representation Unpaid Internshps USERRA Wage & Hour WARN Act weapons policy Webinar Whistleblower Whistleblowers' Protection Act Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Board Work-From-Home Workplace Violence Yahoo
Verrill Dana, LLP

Verrill Dana, LLP is one of New England's preeminent regional law firms. With offices in Portland and Augusta, Maine, Boston and Stamford, Verrill Dana provides sophisticated legal representation to businesses and individuals in the traditional areas of litigation, real estate, business law, labor and employment law, employee benefits, environmental law, intellectual property and estate planning.  The Firm also has industry-focused specialties including higher education, health care and health technology, energy, and timberlands. 

Disclaimer:  The content presented in this blog is for general information only, is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice.  U.S. Treasury Regulations require us to notify you that any tax-related material in this blog (including links and attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and may not be referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.  While we welcome you to contact our blog authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.  

Entries in DIscrimination (6)

Thursday
Dec202012

Inappropriate Work-Place Behavior is Not Pocket Change—Ask the State of Maine

The cost of an anti-discrimination presentation for employees, a workplace sexual harassment seminar, creation of an efficient and useful employee manual—it can seem overwhelming and more than likely, costly.  But believe us, it’s worth it.  The failure of employers to institute policies, train employees on proper workplace behavior, or worse yet, to train employees but not enforce the policies—can be costly.  Just ask the State of Maine.

Click to read more ...

Friday
Jun292012

The New Protected Class: Unemployed Individuals

The District of Columbia has enacted a new law that protects jobless individuals from discrimination in the hiring process.  Although other states (like New Jersey and Oregon)have enacted laws that prohibit discrimination against unemployed applicants, Washington D.C. is the first United States territory to designate unemployed status as a protected class.  The D.C. law is also the first law to grant unemployed individuals with the right to sue employers for discrimination.  The law also contains broad protections for whistleblowers similar to those found in other discrimination statutes.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Mar072012

EEOC ISSUES REVISED GUIDANCE ON THE ADAA AND VETERAN’S EMPLOYMENT

At the end of February, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) issued revised guidance addressing various employment laws and how those laws impact the employment of veterans.  The aim, according to the EEOC, is to make clear how the Americans with Disability Act Amendments “…make it easier for veterans…including those that are often not well understood…to get needed reasonable accommodations” in the workplace.  Included in the discussion are some of the more challenging impairments to accommodate in the workplace, such as traumatic brain injury and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Click to read more ...

Wednesday
Jan252012

Sticks and Stones: HR Director's Comments Used As Direct Evidence of Pregnancy and FMLA Discrimination

Whoever said sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me obviously never dealt with labor and employment issues in the workplace.  Most HR professionals can attest: words matter, communication skills matter, and the use of "talking points" or a script during a termination meeting matters.  A recent decision from the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (Makowsi v. SmithAmundsen LLC) underscores these points and demonstrates just how important words are when communicating termination decisions to employees.

Click to read more ...

Thursday
Jan122012

High Court Finds "Ministerial" Exception To Federal, State, and Local Discrimination Laws

Yesterday the Supreme Court issued an opinion in a closely watched case soundly and unanimously confirming, for the first time, the existence of a “ministerial” exception to federal, state and local discrimination laws.  While the “ministerial” exception had been applied by various circuit courts in the past, Hosanna-Tabor is the Supreme Court’s first consideration of the question of whether a religious organization’s freedom to select its ministers is implicated by a suit alleging discrimination in employment.  The Court answered with a resounding yes.  

Click to read more ...