Search
RSS
Twitter
Topics
: NLRB ADA ADAAA Adverse Action Affordable Care Act Appeal Appointments. Attendance Background Check Benefits CFPB Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Collective Bargaining Agreements Commission Companionship Compensation Confidential Business Information Confidentiality Credit Reporting Agency Criminal Conduct Department of Labor Disability Discharge DIscrimination Dodd-Frank DOL Dues Checkoff EEOC Electronic Use Policy Employee Handbook Essential Functions Facebook FCRA Firearm Flexible Work Schedules FLSA FLSA Exemptions FMLA Form I-9 Franchise Law FTC GINA Healthcare HIPAA Hiring Hostess Independent Contractor Individual Liability Internal Investigation Job Descriptions L.D. 35 Leaves of Absence LLeaves of Absence Maine Human Rights Act Maine Legislature Maine Supreme Judicial Court Massachusetts Law Mediation Medical Fee Schedule MHRA Michigan Military Leave Minimum Wage Ministerial Exception Misclassification NH Legislature NLRA NLRB Notice Notice Posting Requirement OSHA Outside Sales Pregnancy Discrimination Act Premium Decrease Protected Activity Protected Class Reasonable Accomodation Record Keeping Reporting Obligations Representation Elections Retaliation Right-to-Work Rule Making Seasonal Employment Seminar Severence Pay Skilled Labor Social Media Social Media Policy SSocial Media Policy Supervisory Liability Supreme Court Technology Telecommuting Termination Tip Tip Cedit Tip Pooling Title VII Trade Secrets Transgender Twitter Unconstitutional Unemployment Union Union Avoidance Union Representation Unpaid Internshps USERRA Wage & Hour WARN Act weapons policy Webinar Whistleblower Whistleblowers' Protection Act Workers Compensation Workers Compensation Board Work-From-Home Workplace Violence Yahoo
Verrill Dana, LLP

Verrill Dana, LLP is one of New England's preeminent regional law firms. With offices in Portland and Augusta, Maine, Boston and Stamford, Verrill Dana provides sophisticated legal representation to businesses and individuals in the traditional areas of litigation, real estate, business law, labor and employment law, employee benefits, environmental law, intellectual property and estate planning.  The Firm also has industry-focused specialties including higher education, health care and health technology, energy, and timberlands. 

Disclaimer:  The content presented in this blog is for general information only, is not intended to constitute legal advice and cannot be relied upon by any person as legal advice.  U.S. Treasury Regulations require us to notify you that any tax-related material in this blog (including links and attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of avoiding tax penalties, and may not be referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.  While we welcome you to contact our blog authors, the submission of a comment or question does not create an attorney-client relationship between the Firm and you.  

Entries in NLRA (4)

Thursday
Jan102013

The Writing on the Facebook Wall: NLRB finds Facebook Comments in Response to a Co-Worker’s Criticisms of Job Performance was Protected Activity

In Hispanics United of Buffalo, Inc., the Issue before the Board was whether the employer violated Section 8(a)(1) of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) when it discharged five employees for “Facebook comments they wrote in response to a coworker’s criticisms of their job performance.”  The Board ultimately held that the postings constituted protected activity and the terminations were improper.

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Oct022012

NLRB Issues Favorable Social Media Ruling . . . Well, Mostly Favorable

No this is not a typo, and no, you are not dreaming.  In a decision made public on Monday, the NLRB upheld an administrative law judge's finding that a car lot owner did not violate the NLRA when it terminated one its sales people for making "disloyal" social media posts.  This decision is the latest entry in the ongoing NLRB social media saga, and signifies some long awaited good news for employers.  However, employers should not start popping the champagne bottles quite yet.  The decision in Karl Knauz Motors, Inc was based in large part on the specific facts of that case.  And while the NLRB found that the employer did not violate the NLRA for terminating the employee, it did find that several of the employer's work rules were unlawful.  If nothing else, the Karl Knauz decision serves as a good reminder to employers that there is no bright line rule when it comes to employee social media use.

Click to read more ...

Monday
Aug272012

NLRB Muddies the Water On Keeping Internal Investigations Confidential

In Banner Health System, the NLRB recently held that a blanket rule prohibiting employees from discussing ongoing investigations into employee misconduct violates the NLRA.  According to the Board, such a blanket rule runs afoul of Section 7 of the NLRA, which allows employees to engage in protected concerted activity, including discussing their wages, hours and working conditions.  This ruling impacts both union and non-union employers, as many employers ask employees not to discuss details about ongoing company investigations. While the Board's holding is significant, it does not mean that employers are banned from asking employees to keep conversations confidential.  Rather, an employer can still ask employees to keep conversations confidential so long as the employer has a "legitimate business justification."

Click to read more ...

Tuesday
Feb142012

Unlawful Social Media Policies: NLRB's Acting General Counsel Offers More "Guidance" On Employer's Social Media Policies

Social media policies remain a "hot topic" for most employers.  The NLRB's Acting General Counsel recently released a second report (the first report was issued back in August, 2011) discussing 14 recent social media cases.  In 5 of the 7 employee termination cases discussed in the report, the NLRB found that the employer's social media, or other related policies, were unlawful.  In other words, the report reaffirmed that the Board will find employer policies that curtail workers' ability to discuss their wages, hours, and working conditions online to be unlawful.

Click to read more ...