The Wall Street Journal recently published an opinion article analyzing public school teacher compensation. The article discusses sensitive issues relating to factors one should consider when evaluating teacher compensation. For example, the article discusses how a teacher's educational background, relative job security, and three months off inform the analysis about why we compensate teachers the way we do. And, of course, the article deals with the greater pension and healthcare benefits that public sector employees often recieve as compared to their private sector counterparts.
Regardless of whether you agree with the article's opinion, it serves as a reminder to employers - public and private - that analyzing employee compensation packages requires fairness and objectivity. Employers that decide to evalute their compensation packages might want to consider some of the following issues, which have dominated employee compensation discussions in recent years:
- Employers are looking more frequently at the cost disparity between the healthcare benefits offered for families and those for single employees. Single employees often pay significantly less for their health costs than employees with families.
- Equally important is the question of how to account for and treat employees who do not subscribe to company healthcare, and instead rely on another family member's plan.
- Finally, how are other, similar employees being paid? Wage surveys and other vocational data may help employers determine if they are paying employees at, below, or above market. Employers often make adjustments to their wage scale - both upward and downward - in respose to market conditions and institutional values.
While no compensation system will be perfect, and there will always be room to argue over the percieved fairness of compensation plans, employers can and should review their wage and benefit practices. Doing so will help employers identify compensation issues unique to their own business and will help employers determine if their compensation practices are consistent with both the competitive market and the individual needs of their workforce.